The room reads before it meets.
The Executive Authority Scorecard helps you see whether your public presence supports the opportunity you are trying to enter.
Most leaders do not have an experience problem. They have a signal problem.
The work is real. The proof is buried. The profile reads like a resume. The recent thinking does not show how the executive makes decisions.
That gap matters because buyers, boards, partners, journalists, funders and conference organizers do not wait for the full story. They read what is available before deciding how much attention to give the conversation.
What the scorecard measures.
Three of the five sections the Executive Authority Audit runs, scaled to what you can score yourself in one sitting. Same lens, same language, less evidence.
What do nine minutes with your public trail produce?
The first impression, the qualities a reader actually receives, and what a skeptic notices before anything else.
Does the evidence support the move you named?
The room you are trying to enter, scored against what a stranger can actually find. Supported, partial, or not supported.
What does your record leave open?
The questions a counterparty arrives with, and the ones your record currently lets them assume.
It does not cover the other two. The Throughline needs twelve months of your record, and the ranked moves are the output of a diagnosis rather than something you can self-score.
Free first. The diagnosis only if the gap is real.
The scorecard is free and it stays free. You score it yourself, which is its limit. If you want the same read taken from your actual profile instead of your memory of it, the Stranger's Read is free and runs in about a minute. If the gap is material and you want all five sections evidenced and dated, that is the Executive Authority Audit.
Request the Executive Authority Scorecard.
Leave the basics. The worksheet comes by email, and the read is done by a person, not a form.